Legal Tech / E-discovery & investigations
Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant)
Everlaw, Inc. · HQ US · founded 2010 · Last checked 2026-09-21
Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.
Cloud ediscovery platform with EverlawAI Assistant for summaries, coding suggestions and evidence-grounded Q&A; separate federal cloud with FedRAMP Moderate authorisation.
- Category
- E-discovery & investigations · generative-AI review, deposition prep, Storybuilder
- Built for
- Large firms, Mid-sized firms, In-house legal, Courts
- Model providers (disclosed)
- Amazon Web Services, Google, OpenAI
- Data residency options
- United States, United Kingdom, EU (Germany), Canada, Australia
- Pricing
- enterprise
- Markets
- US
- Last checked
- 21 Sept 2026
What the vendor documents
Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.
What the public documentation states
Everlaw's security page states SOC 2 Type 2 attestation, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, encrypted storage, SSO and HIPAA/HITECH safeguards. FedRAMP Moderate applies to the separate federal cloud. The subprocessor list, updated September 16, 2026, names AWS, Google and OpenAI. Customers can select AWS instances in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada or Australia; Google and OpenAI processing is listed in the US or EU, with EU processing for UK/EU instances. This does not promise every AI feature runs in every storage region. The October 1, 2025 terms prohibit using inputs or outputs to train a generative model for general use through the service. Everlaw's AI Governance Framework separately states that enterprise LLM providers delete submitted data after processing and do not train on it. Everlaw retains generated outputs and usage logs within the service. The public DPA remains available.
In the vendor's words
“Everlaw will not use Input or Output to train or finetune a generative AI model for general use through the Service.”
“Customer Data at rest is encrypted using the AES-256 algorithm.”
“SOC 2 Type 2 attestation”
“Output is probabilistic and may not be accurate, reliable, or otherwise appropriate”
Not disclosed on public pages
"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.
On pages read on 2026-09-21, we did not establish an accuracy-testing protocol, public price, trial, minimum term, seat floor, ISO 42001 certification or private-deployment option. LLM-provider zero retention does not remove outputs and logs held by Everlaw. Confirm AI-provider processing locations for the chosen workspace, and request deletion schedules, report scope and contractual exceptions before uploading privileged or regulated material.
Questions to put to the vendor
- Which AWS, Google and OpenAI sub-processor services process matter data for UK and EU (Germany) workspaces?
- Which exceptions apply to the AI Governance Framework's provider zero-retention policy, and how long does Everlaw retain outputs and usage logs?
- What test set, review method and date support the Trust: AI evidence-backed output statements?
- Is ISO 42001 in scope for EverlawAI Assistant or not currently pursued?
Accuracy evidence
- vendor'Verifiable outputs' grounded in cited evidence (vendor) No published metrics.
Related incidents
No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-09-21.
Ownership · Private, VC-backed. Also GovRAMP Moderate, ISO 27017/27018, Cyber Essentials Plus.
Sources
- Everlaw — Security
- Everlaw — Trust: AI
- Everlaw — Trust portal
- SafeLegalAI documentation audit, 2026-09-06: every fact with its quote, source page and archived copy
- Everlaw — Subprocessors, September 16, 2026
- Everlaw — AI Governance Framework
- Everlaw — Customer terms
- Everlaw — DPA
- Everlaw — Privacy notice
Report an issue with this record →
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant)", safelegalai.com/tools/everlaw (last checked 2026-09-21, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
What the vendor has announced, dated
- Everlaw Microsoft 365 Copilot MCP integration goes live · Integration
- Everlaw integrates with Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal · Integration
- Everlaw announces Harvey integration · Partnership
- Everlaw introduces Google Gemini Enterprise MCP integration · Integration
- Everlaw and Morae partner on AI litigation technology · Partnership
First-party statements from the vendor's own pages, as dated; "announced" is not "in use today". This month across all vendors · release timeline.
Documented facts, side by side
- Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant) and Casepoint (CaseAssist)
- Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant) and Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite
- Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant) and DISCO Cecilia AI
- Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant) and Epiq AI (Epiq Discover)
- Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant) and Relativity aiR
- Everlaw (EverlawAI Assistant) and Reveal AI (Ask)
Facts from both vendors' pages in one table; never a ranking. All comparisons.
Also in E-discovery & investigations
SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.
