Legal Tech / Practice management AI
Lupl
Lupl Inc. · HQ US · Last checked 2026-09-03
Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.
Legal work-management platform with AI 'teammates' that draft updates, summarise work and build plans from matter trackers; Azure-hosted with OpenAI as a subprocessor.
Provisional entry: fewer than four governance facts are sourced yet. It is excluded from search indexes until verified.
- Category
- Practice management AI · matter and work management, task management, AI drafting and summaries, workflow automation
- Built for
- Large firms, Mid-sized firms, In-house legal
- Model providers (disclosed)
- OpenAI
- Data residency options
- EU, USA, US, Singapore, Australia, Hong Kong
- Pricing
- per-seat
- Markets
- US, UK, SINGAPORE
- Last checked
- 03 Sept 2026
What the vendor documents
Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.
What the public documentation states
Lupl's homepage describes "Work Management for Lawyers and AI Teammates" and says lawyers and AI teammates use one workspace to assign tasks, trigger workflows and track work. The EULA incorporates a Data Protection Addendum and Annex III sub-processor list as at 1 September 2025. That list names Open AI, Inc. for Lupl AI features in the USA and Microsoft Inc. as cloud service provider in the EU and USA, with other listed locations including Singapore, Australia and Hong Kong. The EULA states that AI data is not retained or used to train the model, and the DPA says protected data is deleted when no protected data remains in Lupl's possession or control. The homepage states SOC 2 Type I & II certification and alignment with ISO 27001 standards. The pricing page says pricing is based on user count and provides a custom quotation. The EULA gives no accuracy guarantee for results or recommendations.
In the vendor's words
“Your data is not retained or used to train the model.”
“Pricing is based on the number of users at your organization.”
“Lupl is certified under SOC 2 Type I & II and aligned with ISO 27001 standards”
Not disclosed on public pages
"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.
Not published on the pages we read on 2026-09-06: a list price, minimum contract term, terms last-updated date, ISO 42001 statement, private-deployment option, SSO/SAML statement and accuracy-testing method. A law firm's procurement or DPIA process would normally ask for these points to document client-confidentiality controls, SRA/ABA competence and supervision checks, and GDPR Art. 28 processor terms.
Questions to put to the vendor
- Which Annex III sub-processors process matter content for Lupl AI features, and can a UK customer restrict processing to EU locations?
- Does OpenAI's no-retention commitment apply to all Lupl AI features or only the features marked with the Annex III footnote?
- What accuracy test, sample size and reviewer process support generated plans, summaries and recommendations?
- Does the production service support SAML SSO and any private-deployment or tenant-isolation option?
Accuracy evidence
No published accuracy or hallucination evaluation found as of 2026-09-03.
Related incidents
No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-09-03.
Ownership · Law-firm-founded joint venture (CMS, Rajah & Tann, Slaughter and May reported); EU-US DPF listed.
Sources
Report an issue with this record →
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Lupl", safelegalai.com/tools/lupl (last checked 2026-09-03, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
What the vendor has announced, dated
- Elevate acquires Lupl · Acquisition
- Lupl integrates with Harvey · Integration
First-party statements from the vendor's own pages, as dated; "announced" is not "in use today". This month across all vendors · release timeline.
Also in Practice management AI
SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.
