Rocket Lawyer (Rocket Copilot)
Rocket Lawyer Incorporated · HQ US · founded 2008 · Last checked 2026-09-03
Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.
Free AI assistant (legal Q&A, contract review) inside Rocket Lawyer's consumer and SMB platform with attorney escalation; Copilot terms permit use of content to develop and improve the service.
Provisional entry: fewer than four governance facts are sourced yet. It is excluded from search indexes until verified.
- Category
- Consumer legal · AI legal Q&A, AI contract review, business name/logo generator, attorney access
- Built for
- Consumers, Small firms & solos
- Model providers (disclosed)
- Not disclosed
- Data residency options
- US
- Pricing
- free · $12.41/month, $20.75/month, $29.08/month; billed yearly at $149/$249/$349
- Markets
- US
- Last checked
- 03 Sept 2026
What the vendor documents
Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.
What the public documentation states
Rocket Lawyer's Rocket Copilot page describes an AI legal assistant for business owners, with legal questions, document review, business-name ideas and logo generation. The pricing page lists Standard, Premium Legal Services and Business plans, shows a free 7-day trial, and publishes yearly-billed monthly prices of $12.41, $20.75 and $29.08. The privacy policy, last updated November 19, 2024, says services may use tools or systems in the United States and the United Kingdom. The Rocket Copilot terms say Rocket Lawyer may use Content to provide, maintain, develop and improve Rocket Copilot. The terms also say Rocket Copilot is experimental and its information is not guaranteed to be accurate. The audit did not find model providers, subprocessor names, a DPA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, zero-retention terms, private deployment or an accuracy testing method.
In the vendor's words
“We may use Content to provide, maintain, develop, and improve Rocket Copilot”
“not guaranteed to be error free or accurate”
“tools or systems located in both the United States and the United Kingdom”
Not disclosed on public pages
"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.
Not published on the pages we read on 2026-09-06: model providers, subprocessor list, DPA, security certifications, encryption-at-rest terms, no-training-on-customer-data commitment, zero-retention terms, private deployment, SSO, seat minimum and accuracy method. Procurement and DPIA reviewers normally need those points for client confidentiality, processor terms under GDPR Article 28, supervision of AI legal information, and cross-border data-transfer review.
Questions to put to the vendor
- Which model providers or other processors receive Rocket Copilot Content, and in which countries?
- Does using Content to develop and improve Rocket Copilot include training models on customer prompts or documents?
- Is a DPA available for business users who upload client documents to Rocket Copilot?
- Which SOC 2, ISO 27001 or other security reports cover Rocket Copilot and its storage systems?
- What testing supports the legal-information accuracy statements on the Copilot page?
Accuracy evidence
- vendorTerms disclaimer: outputs 'not guaranteed to be error free or accurate' (vendor) No accuracy metrics published.
Related incidents
No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-09-03.
Sources
Report an issue with this record →
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Rocket Lawyer (Rocket Copilot)", safelegalai.com/tools/rocket-lawyer (last checked 2026-09-03, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
Also in Consumer legal
SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.