Legal Tech / Litigation analytics & case prediction
Trellis AI
Trellis Research, Inc. · HQ US · founded 2018 · Last checked 2026-09-03
Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.
State trial-court docket and judge analytics across 3,000+ courts with Trellis AI (Nov 2024) for case assessment, motion drafting and timelines; MCP connectors expose data to Claude and ChatGPT.
Provisional entry: fewer than four governance facts are sourced yet. It is excluded from search indexes until verified.
- Category
- Litigation analytics & case prediction · state trial-court analytics, judge analytics, motion drafting, case assessment, MCP connectors
- Built for
- Small firms & solos, Mid-sized firms, Large firms, In-house legal
- Model providers (disclosed)
- OpenAI, Anthropic
- Data residency options
- Not disclosed
- Pricing
- per-seat
- Markets
- US
- Last checked
- 03 Sept 2026
What the vendor documents
Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.
What the public documentation states
Trellis AI's product page describes a legal AI platform for attorneys and legal professionals of all practice areas and firm sizes. It states that Trellis AI uses multiple large language models, including OpenAI and Anthropic, together with Trellis case data and documents. The same page says uploaded files are encrypted at rest and that Trellis follows SOC 2 standards; no SOC 2 certification is stated in the audit. The privacy policy and terms were dated May 2026 in the audit, but current fetches for those URLs returned 403. The terms audit row records a free-trial reference. No list price, seat floor or minimum term is printed on the product page. For accuracy, the product page says attorneys tested multiple models and thousands of documents, and it also says output should always be reviewed.
In the vendor's words
“including OpenAI and Anthropic”
“All uploaded files are encrypted at rest”
“following System and Organization Controls 2 (SOC 2) standards”
“output should always be reviewed”
Not disclosed on public pages
"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.
Not published on the pages we read on 2026-09-06: DPA terms, a public subprocessor list, training-on-customer-data terms, data residency, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, private deployment, SSO, zero retention, list price, seat floor and minimum term. Litigation files may contain privileged evidence and strategy, so procurement and DPIA review normally asks for processor terms, model data-use terms, transfer locations and the controls behind human review.
Questions to put to the vendor
- Which OpenAI and Anthropic services process uploaded documents, and under which data-use terms?
- Do Trellis AI uploads train any Trellis, OpenAI or Anthropic models?
- Can Trellis provide a DPA and a subprocessor list for customer matter data?
- Which SOC 2 report, if any, supports the page's statement that Trellis follows SOC 2 standards?
- What price, seat floor and minimum term apply after the free trial?
Accuracy evidence
No published accuracy or hallucination evaluation found as of 2026-09-03.
Related incidents
No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-09-03.
Ownership · $14.1M Series A (Oct 2021, Headline and Calibrate); ~$20M raised. Vendor language is 'aligning with SOC 2 standards', not a certification claim; security page blocked fetches.
Sources
Report an issue with this record →
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Trellis AI", safelegalai.com/tools/trellis-ai (last checked 2026-09-03, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
What the vendor has announced, dated
- Trellis describes debt-collection litigation-risk workflow · Named deployment
- Trellis expands agentic access to Claude, ChatGPT and Trellis Chat · Integration
- Trellis brings state trial court dataset to Claude · Integration
First-party statements from the vendor's own pages, as dated; "announced" is not "in use today". This month across all vendors · release timeline.
Also in Litigation analytics & case prediction
SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.