Skip to content

Legal Tech / Litigation analytics & case prediction

Wexler AI

Wexler.ai (Legora) · HQ GB · acquired · Last checked 2026-09-03

Visit website

Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.

Fact-intelligence platform for disputes: extracts facts with confidence scores, builds chronologies and flags contradictions; UK data residency by default; acquired by Legora in July 2026.

Provisional entry: fewer than four governance facts are sourced yet. It is excluded from search indexes until verified.

Category
Litigation analytics & case prediction · fact extraction, chronologies, inconsistency detection, disputes and investigations
Built for
Large firms, Mid-sized firms
Model providers (disclosed)
Not disclosed
Data residency options
UK, US
Pricing
enterprise
Markets
UK, US
Last checked
03 Sept 2026

What the vendor documents

Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.

No training on customer data
not disclosedsource
SOC 2
documented yessource
ISO 27001
documented yessource
ISO 42001
not disclosedsource
Zero retention with model providers
not disclosedsource
DPA offered
not disclosedsource
Private deployment
documented yessource

What the public documentation states

Wexler's public pages describe a platform for complex disputes, eDiscovery and document review. The security page states SOC 2 Type II, ISO27001 certification, SSO and regular penetration testing. The homepage audit row states international data storage is available and that private cloud is an option. The privacy policy gives no printed update date and says Wexler retains personal data only for as long as necessary for the purposes in that policy. The public pages reviewed did not name model providers or subprocessors, and did not state training-on-customer-data or zero-retention terms. Pricing is handled through a demo request; no list price, free trial, seat floor or minimum term is printed. The accuracy row is a customer quotation on Wexler's public page reporting a hallucination rate below 0.1%; the audit notes that no methodology page was found.

In the vendor's words

“ISO27001 certification”
Security
“SOC 2 Type II”
Security
“private cloud”
Homepage
“only for as long as is necessary”
Privacy Policy

Not disclosed on public pages

"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.

Not published on the pages we read on 2026-09-06: model providers, a subprocessor list, DPA terms, privacy and terms update dates, training-on-customer-data terms, zero retention, encryption-at-rest wording, ISO 42001, list price, free trial, seat floor, minimum term and an accuracy method. Disputes data can contain privileged evidence, so due diligence normally asks for processor identities, transfer regions, retention limits and test methods for supervised legal work.

Questions to put to the vendor

  1. Which model providers and subprocessors process dispute documents, and in which regions?
  2. Does Wexler or Legora use Customer Data to train or fine-tune any AI model?
  3. Can Wexler provide a DPA, subprocessor list and breach-notification window for matter data?
  4. What testing method supports the public hallucination-rate quotation?
  5. Which country options are covered by international data storage and private cloud?

Accuracy evidence

Related incidents

No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-09-03.

Ownership · Acquisition by Legora announced 29 July 2026 (per vendor homepage).

Sources

Report an issue with this record →

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Wexler AI", safelegalai.com/tools/wexler-ai (last checked 2026-09-03, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Also in Litigation analytics & case prediction

SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.